PuppyMonkeyBabyShakespeare

Bardfilm hadn’t seen a certain strangely viral SuperBowl commercial, and then promptly cursed my name for ever showing it to him.  Which of course brought about a round of silliness.

“I shall laugh myself to death at this puppymonkeybaby-headed monster!” 

“Cry Havoc! And let slip the puppymonkeybabies of war…” 

“Use me but as your puppymonkeybaby, spurn me, strike me…” 

“Why should a puppymonkeybaby have life, and thou no breath at all?” 

“I’ll teach you: think yourself a puppymonkeybaby that you have taken these tenders for true pay.” 

“Marry, I cannot show it in rhyme; I have tried: I can find out no rhyme to “lady” but “puppymonkeybaby,” an innocent rhyme” 

“Eye of newt and toe of frog, Wool of bat and tongue of puppymonkeybaby.” 

“I had rather hear my puppymonkeybaby bark at a crow than a man swear he loves me. “

Ok, have we cracked the wind of the poor phrase by running it thus?  Do you tender me a fool yet? Got any more?

Let Slip The Puppy of War

Got an absolutely fascinating request last week. A reader from Canada wrote:

We are about to get a new dog, a beautiful purebred baby Doberman. We want to Name her ‘River”, because we have a small river running through our ranch (our current 10 month old male is called ‘Rancher’).

This seems simple enough. Not. Purebred breeders always create a ‘theme’ name for each litter.  So, the way the naming works is, the name of the breeder comes first, then the full chosen name of the dog. The full name of the dog can be shortened for everyday use. Example: Our breeder’s name is Braebrook’s, they are naming another puppy To Be Or Not To Be, and the every-day name will be Toby. If asked what the full name is, the answer would be, Braebrook’sTo Be Or Not To Be.

With that info in mind, we’ve learned that the theme for River’s litter is “Shakespeare”. So, we are now trying to connect our everyday name (River) with Shakespeare. I’ve searched everywhere!!! I’m stumped.

Got that? It gets trickier, as I learned that there’s a max of 30 characters, counting spaces and punctuation. “Braebrook’s” takes up 11 characters, so the challenge is to come up with a Shakespeare reference that has some meaningful connection such that it could be reduced to “River” as a short, day-to-day name.

The reader had already found “Fruitful River” ( from Hamlet’s “fruitful river in my eye” ) but didn’t love it, and I agree – nobody’s going to recognize that as Shakespeare at first glance.

My first thought turned to Ophelia, and “Willow Grows Aslant A Brook”.  It’s a bit of a dark reference, sure. But there’s some real poetry in that scene.  That’s too many letters, though, so we’d have to settle for something like ‘Slanted Willow’.  I later learned that they do in fact have a recently planted willow tree near the river, so that’s a contender. And yes,  in case anybody thinks the same way I do, I did write back “For the love of god don’t let anybody climb it!” when they told me that.

I flip through my thesaurus and my reference material and come up with some other logical contenders.

“Good Master Brook” is a nice Merry Wives reference, but this is a girl dog so it’s not a great match.

I find that I like “Let Rome in Tiber Melt”, from Antony and Cleopatra. I’m even asked to provide additional context and explanation for that quote, but ultimately they’re still liking Slanted Willow.

I bring in Bardfilm, who has forgotten more about this subject than I’ll ever know. He mentions “What News On the Rialto” which I like (having been there myself), but Rialto really is more about the district, rather than the bridge. The river connection is a bit tenuous.

And then, just like that, it hits us. How could we have missed it?  I kicked myself when I realize that I’d forgotten the most obvious Shakespeare river reference.  I sent it off to my reader, who immediately fell in love with it as well.

Figured it out?

Ladies and gentlemen, introducing Braebrook’s Sweet Swan of Avon, aka River :

Shakespeare Dreams (A Continuing Series)

Sometimes, I dream in Shakespeare.  I love when that happens.
Last night I dreamed that I was writing a version of The Tempest as poem. I’m not sure the official term for it when you tell a story like that (I’m thinking of Longfellow’s stuff)? A narrative style, where you walk through the plot one stanza at a time.  
All I can remember vividly is thinking I would have to rhyme “child” with “isle” before realizing that I could get fancy and rhyme “child and” with “island.” It had the standard A/B/A/B rhyme scheme, nothing fancy.

Wish I could remember more of it. The dream part was about their departure from the island, and turning the kingdom over to Caliban before they left. I definitely remember part of the dream being about hoping I had an auto-save feature so that I would not lose my work.

What If … Romeo and Juliet Was Told in Flashback?

Imagine a production of Romeo and Juliet that opens in the tomb, with both dead. Cue prologue.

One of the most common questions asked about Romeo and Juliet is why Shakespeare gives away the ending (“A pair of star-cross’d lovers take their life”) in the first lines. It is the very definition of a spoiler, and it is baked right into the script.

Today on the way to work I was thinking about other stories that open up three quarters of the way through. We’re in the middle of a wedding, or the good guy is being chased by a horde of bad guys, and we have just a moment to wonder, “How’d we get here?” before the scene changes, some sort of “Six months prior…” card appears on screen, and we start the real story. There’s a stake in the ground now. Instead of sitting back and thinking, “I wonder what’s going to happen?” you’re left thinking, “I wonder how we’re going to get from here to there?”

That’s exactly what Shakespeare does. Granted, the modern version usually opens with the good guy in significant peril but, you know, not actually dead yet. Still, though, the point stands. You immediately open with a “Wait, what? How does that happen exactly?” moment where you find yourself thrown into the end of the story, and then suddenly the scene changes and you get to see the story from the beginning.

Don’t forget Paris!  Fine, you know this is Romeo and Juliet, you hear “pair of star-crossed lovers” and see a young man and women entwined in death, you get that.  But who the heck is the random dude on the floor? What’s his story?

Oo! I just thought of something even better. Instead of opening to the scene of them already dead, open to Romeo still alive and holding the poison. Or, I suppose, Juliet holding the dagger.  Play it on alternate nights. Really build up the suspense.  I mean, you know in your head that they both die. But with tricks like this you still have to spend the play wondering if just maybe?

So, This Is What That Feels Like

A funny thing happened on the way to the weekend.

Reddit user JAugustus posted this Venn diagram of his own creation to /r/shakespeare with the caption, “Let The Arguing Begin”:

I’m way more interested in supporting and circulating original Shakespeare content (especially visually appealing content such as this) than I am about arguing his individual choices, so I put the image up on my Facebook and Twitter pages.

And then this happened.

I’ve never had a post go viral before, so it’s been fascinating to watch.  You just never really know what’s going to resonate and what won’t.  The reddit group didn’t really like the image and wanted to spend more time debating the actual tagging choices.  The creator of the graphic (who I have kept in the loop, I did not steal his work) was honestly surprised at the reaction it’s gotten. In the meantime it’s been shared 8000 times, over a million people had the potential to see it, and I picked up almost 2000 Facebook followers.

And that’s only Facebook. I put it out on Twitter as well and got dozens of RTs and hundreds of new followers. Nice numbers, but it still pales in comparison to the Facebook numbers.

I’m having fun digging into the data to try and get a clue why sometimes things go viral. On Twitter in particular you can see who RT’d you, and how many followers they have.  So I see numbers in the hundreds, hundreds, hundreds, boom, somebody with 23,000 followers RTs it.  Aha!  Then somebody with 11k.  And so on.  There’s an exponential element at work in things like this. It can get passed around a group of people and never really hit, until somebody comes along who literally has 100x the reach, and then it really starts to open up. It’s only a matter of time before somebody with 10x *their* followers sees it. Like the old saying goes, “…then they told 1000 friends, and they told 1000 friends, and so on, and so on….”

I hope all my new followers enjoy what we’ve got to offer!  Hello there! Welcome!