It’s My Much Ado Review, Coming Right At You

So I did get to see Joss Whedon’s Much Ado About Nothing last week, and only now am I finding the time to write about it.  This is no way reflects how much I loved this movie.

Loved it.  Love love loved.  I was not yet out of the movie theatre before I tweeted something like “A revolution in Shakespeare movie making.”
Now, let’s talk about it in more detail.  I’m pretty sure that all my regular readers already know the details, but I’ll take you through them just in case.  Director Joss Whedon and a bunch of his friends regularly hang out at his house and do script read-throughs like regular people might play board games.  These friends of his include Alexis Denisof, Amy Acker and Nathan Fillion, all of whom you’ve seen before in various Whedon creations (Buffy, Firefly, Avengers, etc…)  Yes, I said Avengers — Agent Phil Coulson is even in this one.
So, anyway, Whedon says to his crew one day, “This time we’re going to film it.”  And there you have it.  Twelve days of filming his friends, at his house, using his own stuff as props.
What we get is not perfect, and it’s driving some of the Shakespeare purists nuts, but I love the end result.   I want him to do this again and again.
Much Ado About Nothing maps wonderfully to our situation.  Leonato basically welcomes some very important guests to his house and throws a huge party, which soon turns into a wedding (and then a funeral, and then a wedding).  You absolutely buy this, right from the beginning.  The limousines arrive outside, Leonato and his family go to greet their guests, and it all just works.  We even get a shot of Benedick and Claudio being led up to the room where they’ll be staying, decorated with stuffed animals – *exactly* what happens when guests come to stay at someone’s house and get put up in whatever rooms are available (in this case perhaps a daughter’s room?)  We walk the halls with characters, we spot the housekeepers putting away laundry in the background.  Later we’ll see Benedick running up and down the stairs in sweatpants, getting in his daily workout.  There was never a time in this movie that I did not think, “Ok, cool, a rich guy is putting up guests in his house for the week” … because that’s exactly what was happening.  Genius.
The masquerade scene is absolutely gorgeous.  There’s entertainment, there’s the pool, there’s groups of people just hanging out and chatting.  Something that I loved, that I wish he’d carried through the whole movie, is that the soundtrack turns out to be a guest singing at the piano.  After all, none of us have a soundtrack to our lives, but we do occasionally walk into situations where there is music.  In a later scene we again hear music, only to discover that Don Pedro has found a guitar and is sitting in the corner picking away at it while people are talking.
Ok, let’s talk about the characters.  I could talk all day about how this movie looks, but what I’m sure everybody wants to know is how well they performed it.  Let me say a couple of things up front to set the stage.  I think my favorite performance was Reed Diamond’s Don Pedro.  I don’t know what sort of Shakespeare experience he’s got, but I thought his delivery was spot on, hitting the right combination of selling the Shakespeare while still acting his part, if that makes sense.  He was the visiting dignitary, a guest in Leonato’s home. Half the time he looks like he might have been drunk, but that was also totally in character.  
Second favorite?  Fran Kranz as Claudio.  This version of the play tries to make it all about Claudio/Hero, rather than Benedick/Beatrice, and I’m ok with that.  This will drive MAAN fans nuts, I’m sure (more on the weaknesses of B&B in a bit).  I realized very quickly that this was turning into a wonderful romantic movie that just happened to be a Shakespeare movie, rather than the other way around, if that makes sense.  We Shakespeare geeks can talk about Claudio/Hero as being this little side story when really we want to dig into the interchange between Benedick and Beatrice, but really, does the random movie goer with no background knowledge of the story want that?  If you just follow the plot, doesn’t it make more sense that people would think it’s more about Claudio?  Claudio’s the one getting married (and he tells his friend Benedick about it).  Claudio’s the one that gets screwed over, and then screws himself over by reacting so poorly over the news, and Claudio’s the one that has to fix it in the end.  
Something that I really liked is that Don Pedro and Claudio were buddies throughout the show – everywhere you saw one, you saw the other.  That worked perfectly for Don Pedro as the half drunk dignitary who just wandered from situation to situation trying to keep everybody happy, and it worked to elevate Claudio by always having him in the Don’s company, as if every time Benvolio showed up, the Prince entered as well.  I’m not sure I love that analogy, I’ll work on it.
Ok, now let’s talk about the weaknesses.  I, like many, did NOT like the chemistry between Benedick and Beatrice.  I’m sure Whedon fans were excited to see Acker and Denisof as a couple again (apparently they were, in some other show?) but I know nothing about that.  If anything, I recognize Denisof as one of Robin’s boyfriends(?) on How I Met Your Mother.
I thought Whedon would do more with Beatrice.  The movie opens (I don’t think this is a spoiler) with a “next morning” scene, and a man slipping quietly from Beatrice’s bed and leaving without a word.  “Interesting,” I’m thinking, “Is this supposed to establish that Beatrice is looking for love, and never finding it?  Always ending up with the wrong guy?”  But it turns out I completely misinterpreted that scene.  
The thing is, while it’s established early that she is interested in Benedick, you never understand why.  He’s a bit of an ass, right from the very beginning.  The banter between the two can be done mutually, they’re both playing the same game.  But here it’s far more obvious that Benedick goes for the easy cheap shots, and it visually upsets Beatrice when he does that.  I think there’s even a line, I can’t remember off the top of my head, where she says almost exactly that.  She’s having fun, he’s being mean.  That, coupled with my earlier guess that Beatrice keeps getting involved with the wrong men, just points to Benedick as another one of the wrong ones, not Mr. Right.
Denisof’s Benedick is good when he’s doing the physical comedy.  The scene where Don Pedro, Claudio and Leonato are trying to convince him that Beatrice loves him was hysterical, to the point of being ridiculous (it is painfully obvious that there’s no way they do not see him).  Later when he starts strutting in front of Beatrice (knowing that she likes him) is again funny, but in a far more predictable way.  But you know what?  Sometimes predictable is ok, getting back to the idea of “the audience that just walked in without knowing what to expect.”  People don’t always want to analyze.  Sometimes they just want to laugh.  And they’ll laugh, a lot, at Benedick.
A quick note on Nathan Fillion as Dogberry?  From where I sit, he’s the biggest star.  Maybe that’s just because I recognize him more than the others.  So I was waiting for him for the whole movie.  Is it fair to say that I laughed my head off the entire time, and yet I was disappointed?  It’s as if he was the least comfortable with his Shakespeare, and decided that he was going to “make it his own.”  Everything he does and says is brilliantly funny, but it feels the least like Shakespeare.  Does that make sense?  If you didn’t know he was doing Shakespeare, you might not even realize it.  Again, this is one of those situations that I think works best for the non-Shakespeare audience, so my disappointment comes more from the fact that I was hoping to see out of him what I saw out of Don Pedro – somebody who could deliver a believable, entertaining character, while still leaving no doubt that he was performing Shakespeare.
I’ve got to wrap this up, so let me see if I can explain why I love it so much despite its “flaws”.  I love the idea of a small, intimate Shakespeare movie like this.  A bunch of friends get together in close quarters for a little while.  There are fights, there are disagreements, there is laughter, there is arguing, and everybody makes up in the end.  If you judge a movie like this primarily on its Shakespeare, it will likely come up short.  But if you want your Shakespeare to be timeless and universal, the kind of story that’s been relevant to audiences for four hundred years and will continue to be for another four hundred?  Whedon’s approach demonstrates a whole new way to go about that.  It’s not just the intimate setting.  The lopsidedness of some of the performances only adds to it.  Some are excellent in their delivery, some aren’t.  It’s like a Shakespearean dial that gets turned to low in some scenes and medium-high in others.  When others have done “modern Shakespeare” they’ll just go ahead and rewrite most of it, leaving only the key lines.  That’s awful. That points a big spotlight at the text and says “Look where we shoehorned in that line!”  What we get in Whedon’s version isn’t even planned.  It’s not like he told Reed Diamond to bring the Shakespeare more than, say, Don John.  He threw all of his ingredients into this particular pot, stirre it around a bit, and let everybody find their stride.  The result is natural, approachable, and wonderful.  Go see it, preferably with someone who knows nothing about Shakespeare, then ask their opinion.
A quick note on parental guidance, and bringing the kids, since everybody knows this is an issue with me.  I will not be letting the kids see this one, for two or three particular scenes.  First is the “morning after” scene I spoke of that opens up the movie.  This one isn’t too bad, though, and it’s easily skipped past.  Second comes a scene that makes it obvious that Don John and Conrad (who is played by a woman here) are a couple.  This includes getting horizontal on the bed and helping her out of her clothes.  Hmmm.  Little bit harder to explain away that one, since it is a long scene.  And then of course at the end is the Margaret/Borachio scene, which plays out like it always has (well, since Branagh I guess).  None of these scenes have any overt nudity, it’s primarily a question of what else happens. The Don John / Conrad scene is probably the worst, since it involves the most overtly sexual contact between the two.

Guest Post: Shakespearean Song from My Fair Lady

Bardfilm has been up to his old tricks. This time, he claims to have discovered an early working version of “The Rain in Spain Stays Mainly in the Plain” from My Fair Lady—one that focused more on how Henry Higgins took a common lady of the London streets and taught her to speak in iambic pentameter. Here, according to Bardfilm at least, is the scene in question—and the lead song from it (sing along, if you like):

ELIZA: The Dane in pain has plainly gone insane.

HENRY: What was that?

ELIZA: The Dane in pain has plainly gone insane.

HENRY: Again.

ELIZA: The Dane in pain has plainly gone insane.

HENRY: I think she’s got it. I think she’s got it!

ELIZA: The Dane in pain has plainly gone insane.

HENRY: By George, she’s got it. By George, she’s got it! Now, once again, who is insane?

ELIZA: It’s the Dane! It’s the Dane!

HENRY: And what’s wrong with his brain?

ELIZA: Insane! Insane!

ELIZA, HENRY, AND PICKERING: The Dane in pain has plainly gone insane.

HENRY: In Hamlet, Henry V and Henry VIII . . .

ELIZA: Horatio hardly heckles.

HENRY (Playing on xylophone): Da dum dee dum de dum dum dum

ELIZA: To be, or is it not to be?

HENRY: Now, once again, who is insane?

ELIZA: It’s the Dane! It’s the Dane!

HENRY: And what’s wrong with his brain?

ELIZA: Insane! Insane!

ELIZA, HENRY, AND PICKERING: The Dane in pain has plainly gone insane. The Dane in pain has plainly gone insane!

Our thanks for this guest post to kj, the author of Bardfilm. Bardfilm is a blog that comments on films, plays, and other matters related to Shakespeare.

My Directorial Debut! Act III (Conclusion)

{ When we last left off we’d decided to cut out the Athenians and focus on the Mechanicals, in the interests of time.  Call it a sacrifice to the gods of slower than expected readers. }

I quickly summarize that Oberon and Titania are fighting, and that Oberon has sent his trusty minion Puck to hunt down this special flower that will act as a love potion such that, when Titania wakes up, she’ll fall in love with whatever the first thing she sees, whether it’s a boy or a girl or a bird or a bug.  “Or a monster!” says one student.

“Exactly!” says I, “That’s kind of the whole point.  Oberon thinks that would be hysterical.”

It’s here that I make my first real mistake, as the children are waiting for me to do something with the first of the props that they’ve made and realize that it’s not going to be used.  I’m to learn later from my daughter that, “Daddy, we spent a lot of time on that flower and you didn’t even use it.”  So, I felt bad about that.  That turns out to be the only prop that was not used, and of course it’s the one my daughter made.

But!  I’ve given her the sleeping Titania role, when she wakes up and falls in love with monkey Bottom.

The scenes go on apace, and for each exeunt I collect and redistribute the scripts.  Every time the hands go up just as excitedly, so I guess they are still having fun.  And every time I save Bottom to the end, like a prize.

This time we introduce Puck, who brings us the first real stage directions.  “Don’t enter until your line,” I tell him, “And remember, no one can see you.”  Later, when Pyramus exits, I tell Puck “Follow him!” and lead both of them right out of the room, palming the monkey mask that I’ve hidden in the props.  “Ok,” I tell them, “You’ve just turned him into a monkey.  So Bottom, when you hear your name called again, come in holding this mask in front of your face. And remember, you don’t know you’re a monkey.”

I return to the class and whisper to the other actors on stage, “When Bottom returns and you get to the stage direction about exit screaming in panic, I want you all to do exactly that, scream and run away.  Then each of you runs back on for one line, delivers it, and runs away again.”

This turns out to work quite well, and it’s the first acting they do.  Bottom is summoned, he returns, they scream and run away.  I thought the scene would get more laughs than it did, especially with lines like “I know what you’re doing, you’re trying to make a monkey out of me!” but I got very little.  Ah well.

And now comes the next big highlight of my day, as my daughter wakes from her slumber and begins, “What angel wakes me from my flowery bed? I pray thee, gentle mortal, sing again.  Mine ear is much enamour’d of thy note; So is mine eye enthralled to thy shape; I swear, I love thee!”

This marks the first time that one of my children has performed Shakespeare.  In public, on a stage, reading original text.  I damn near wept.  I am thankful that it turned out to be a small part because I think that the longer it went, I might well have exploded.  And you know what?  She was good.  She woke up on cue, and actually got up while reading her lines, which she did not stumble over.  Definitely one of my better performers, duly noted for future reference.

We move quickly to the big finish. I explain to them how everything resolves, and how the final scene is the big royal wedding.  All of the humans are guests at the wedding and will remain in their seats, calling out to the actors on the stage.  I call for the props.  I should have taken inventory, I don’t even know the complete list of props I have.  There are two swords, which would have been used for Lysander and Demetrius to fight, which we’ve cut. So one will be used for Bottom to kill himself.  I make the mistake of saying that out loud and somebody says, “Bottom KILLS himself?!”  so I have to turn around and say, “Well, no, he *pretends* to.  You’ll see.”

One girl has arrived to school very late today, and missed the majority of the excitement.  Not wanting to leave anybody out, she becomes my Hippolyta.  She has no idea how to read a script, or that I have told the humans to remain seated when they deliver their lines.

For “Wall” they have taken a big roll of art paper and covered in a red brick pattern.  So I go to the girl who is playing that role and say, “Arms up!”  She does.  I hold one end at her side and say, “Arms down!”  She complies, realizing that she is to hold it in place.  I then wrap her up in it, mummy style.  Wall gets the laughs and I get a sense of awareness from the audience when she says things like, “I present…a wall.”

She gets to the bit about a chink in the wall.  I’m standing behind her, reach my arm out and say, “Give me one of these,” sticking out two fingers in a sideways V, like scissors.  She does the same.  I tell the audience, “I’m totally not even kidding, that’s the stage direction. That’s the hole in the wall that Pyramus and Thisby talk through.”

We continue.  My Pyramus is one of the better readers and seems to be getting into the silliness of his lines at this point. When he’s supposed to look through the chink in the wall I tell him, “Get down there and look through the hole in the wall!”  He bends his knees so that he’s down to wall height, clearly keeping some sort of 8yr old mandated minimum distance between boys and girls, like he’s trying to see through the hole in the wall from about 3 feet away.

Thisbe happens to be a girl at this point, and delivers her lines.  Bottom tentatively delivers his “Kiss me through the hole in this vile wall” line, and Thisby rolls right into “I kiss the wall’s hole and not your lips at all!”

My Pyramus, who I told you was smart, fist pumps and utters an audible, “Yes!” as he realizes that he doesn’t have to kiss anybody.  Bravo to him, if he’d read ahead and knew that line was coming, that he didn’t panic!

Enter Lion, holding a lion mask that I brought.  “Roar,” I tell her, “You’re a lion.  Thisby, when you see the lion, drop your scarf and run away.”

“Roar,” she says.  Thisby drops her scarf and runs away.

“Well roared, Lion!” calls Demetrius from the audience.

“Well run, Thisbe!” calls Theseus from his seat.  I realize that he is wearing a crown, because apparently they made king and queen crowns and darn it all these kids have adopted an, “I made that prop I’m going to use it!” attitude that I commend.

Silence.  “Hippolyta,” I say to the new girl, “You have a line.”

She stands up and walks onto the stage, flipping through her script.  “Where are we?” she asks.

“Just say Well shone, Moon! and then sit back down.”

“Well shone, Moon!”   Sits.

Exit Lion.  Enter Pyramus.  I hand him a sword and try to whisper to him, “When you get to your last line, just drop the script, stab yourself, and say “Die!” like 7 times as you stagger around the stage dying.”   I figure he’s my best shot at actually understanding what I want out of this character, but he’s still more shy than confident, and his death stagger is about a step and a half and then he falls down on stage dead.  It’s a start.

(Funny bit where dying Pyramus gets to “Moon lose thy light!” and I call in, “Lose thy light, Moon!”  Confused look.  “Leave the stage!”)

Eventually we wrap it up as time is clearly not on our side.  I sweep everybody off stage in one direction as Puck enters from the other to wrap it all up. I’d love to say that there was some sort of magical significance to the most famous of all the Dream lines, but really it was just another string of trying to understand, for them.

I congratulate and applaud them all.  “Congratulations,” I tell them all, “You have all just performed the work of William Shakespeare. What you just read, right there in that script?”  I go and get my First Folio again, and hold it up, this time taking it out of its case.  “Is right here in this book.  400 years ago, William Shakespeare wrote what you just read.”  I open up the book and walk around, showing them what the original text looks like.  They are spellbound.  I only wish that I’d planned ahead that I would do this, because I would have bookmarked Puck’s final passage so that I could tie the two together.  Oh well, lesson learned for next time.

And that’s my adventure!  The teacher asked if she could keep the scripts in case they got time later to play with them some more, and I said absolutely.  Later she emailed me and asked if I would be interested in doing it again next year, this time with some more planning and study of what’s going on.  Again, absolutely!  I’m unclear whether she meant “Come back and do a third grade class again” or “Do it for fourth grade” since my daughter will be moving on, but I’m pretty sure I’d be up for both.

Later I heard from my daughter about the flower issue, and about how one girl got three parts (whereas the others all got only 1 or 2), and a couple boys who told my daughter that they only said they liked it because it wasn’t regular school work.  Standard gossip.  I heard my daughter saying both, “I got to be Titania!” and also, “I only had a couple of lines” and “I only got to go once,” so I’m a bit bummed out about that.  But when I come into my kids’ classes I am overly sensitive to the possibility of giving them *too* much special attention.  Besides, as I told her, I’ve come into her classes and brownie troops many times so she’s had much more opportunity to experience this stuff that was brand new to most of the kids.

I don’t know what I’d do differently next time. It’s hard to just pull a single scene out of context and really dig into it.  I think that next time I’ll have to do a series of visits, maybe do some rehearsing of scenes leading up to a final performance.  I’ve still got a lot of years to go!  We haven’t even gotten started with my boy yet (who is 7 years old).

My Directorial Debut! Continued.

{The story so far… }

So I initially ask whether any kids have been to theatre camp, figuring I’ll need to give lessons in how to read a script.  Nope, I’m assured that there was some sort of whole school assembly in first grade and that they all have read scripts before.  Cool.

I bring up the tiny detail that in Shakespeare’s day, no girls were allowed and the boys played the girls parts.  So I ask for a vote whether we should have the boys play boy parts and girl play girl parts (“Yayyy!!!”), or if we should mix it up and maybe a girl plays a boy’s part and a boy plays a girl’s part (“Nooo!!!!!!”)  So we stick with conventional gender casting (so I thought).

I go to the whiteboard, where I will offer play by play. I start by drawing Theseus, a smiley face with a crown, and Hippolyta, a smiley face with long hair and a crown.  “That’s his queen,” says one girl.

“No,” say I, “Not yet.  When the play opens, Theseus and Hippolyta are going to be married.  So she’s not his queen yet!”

Anyway I continue, drawing Lysander and Hermia (with a big lovey heart between them, and arrows in both directions), then Demetrius with a lovey heart pointing at Hermia (and no arrow back).  Then I draw Helena with a lovey heart pointing to Demetrius, and no lovey heart back.

“This is complicated!” I hear one student say.

“It’s just getting started!” I say back.  I explain to them what’s to happen, about how Demetrius has Hermia’s father (who does not appear in this edited version) on his side, and how Lysander and Hermia are going to elope into the woods, with Demetrius and Helena following.

I explain to the children that this play is Shakespeare’s silliest play, and that they should not be afraid to get silly with it.  “If you get picked to read for one of the characters in love, then you need to be over the moon and stars, I will die without you, I have to go kill myself if I can’t be with you…” with it.  I am trying to put them at ease and encourage them to have fun with it.  We shall see.

I distribute scripts to my first actors and….. ACTION!

First problem is I have drastically overestimated the reading ability of these children.  I mean, I get that there’s plenty of words they will have never seen before, and I am liberal in boosting them over those hurdles.  But remember where I said “for any given speech I have no way of knowing whether it will take the student 10 seconds or a minute?”  It becomes apparent that I’ve got a worst case scenario on my hands, and that this is going to take forever.

Act I Scene 1 is a long scene if you’ve never stopped to notice.  We hear about the royal wedding, we meet the young Athenians, we hear about their history, we get the whole “marry Demetrius or die” thing, the royals leave, Lysander and  Hermia plot to escape, Helena returns and learns the plot…  two thirds of the way through this scene I’m thinking, “This is not going to work.”  But we struggle through.

What none of them seem willing to do is move around.  They have stood in a line, and read as their part comes up.  At “Stand forth, Demetrius” I say, “Demetrius?  Stand forth! Step forward!” which he does.  You’d then hope that at “Stand forth, Lysander” my Lysander would figure it out and he, too, would step up.  Nope.

Funny moment #1 — At one point during this scene, my Lysander referred to his true love as “Harmonica.”  The kids’ brains at this age do this sort of “I recognize the pattern of several of the letters of that word, therefore I will guess that it is a word I know that also has that pattern.”  Herm something with an a on the end becomes harmonica!  Makes sense.

We exeunt At the end I ask if anybody followed that.  They all agree that no, nobody followed that.  Someone notes that “It sounds like the way they talk at church,” which I thought was interesting because I can’t recall any specific Latin in the text at this point.  I point to my diagram and how it connects to what was just played out in front of them.

The next scene is the Mechanicals, which I will bring them back into (a) some opportunity for silliness and, more, importantly, (b) much shorter speeches.  I  go back to the white board and explain the Mechanicals who want to perform for the royal wedding.   I also explain Oberon and Titania, the fairy king and queen who are in an argument, who are wandering around the woods as well causing trouble.

The casting of the Mechanicals is interesting because so many of them have so few lines, I didn’t want there to be fighting about who got the good parts.  I held Bottom aside, distributed the others randomly, then explained Bottom.  “Bottom is the biggest role in the play,” I said.  “He’s got a lot of lines.  He thinks he’s in charge of the actors, and he never stops talking.  Whoever takes this role has to be confident enough to perform a character like that.  Who is up for it?”  Hands shoot up.  I give it to one boy, who unfortunately does not end up being the strongest reader, but everybody’s got their strengths and weaknesses and I’m not here to criticize the kids.

I have given the Mechanical parts to boys and girls alike so that it’s not lopsided for girls parts.  Turns out to work because at least for this scene I’ve given Flute to a girl, who gets to deliver the “Let me not play a woman, I have a beard coming!”  line.  This gets my first semblance of a laugh of understanding from the audience.

My Bottom (ahem) is struggling so I try to help him out with more direction.  I explain that Quince is supposed to be the director, but Bottom thinks he knows everything.  I throw in the line that, “In his head, he’s Brad Pitt.”  <cricket chirp>  I even pause at that one, surprised at the lack of reaction. “Who’s that?” asks a student.  I move on.  I tell Bottom that the second Quince stops talking, he’s to jump in and talk over him.  He does ok.

As we get through that scene and do a time check I realize that we are not going to get anywhere near the end of this play at this rate, and that we’ll have to cut like crazy.  I want to get to the end because the kids have made all the props that will not be useful until the final scene.  So we agree quickly to cut out the adventures of the Athenians in the forest and focus only on Bottom and his merry crew.

To be continued, again…  (sorry but the day job calls!)

My Directorial Debut!

For years I’ve been volunteering to “do Shakespeare” for my children’s elementary school classes. Over the years that’s involved playing games, reading books, teaching the sonnets and a few other things, and every time somebody’s said, “Get them up out of the seats and performing the text!”

Done and done.

The scene:  3rd grade, which in this case means 8-9 yr olds.  About 26 kids I was told, though I did not count.  I was given free reign to do whatever I wanted. But here’s the catch, it’s a one time event.  So it’s not like I was going to be coming back 5 times, 4 to rehearse and one for a final performance or something.  Whatever we’d be doing, we’d be doing all at once.

Luckily due to an aborted project last year I had a number of notes about doing A Midsummer Night’s Dream (note to self as I fix a typo, “Kidsummer Night’s Dream” would be a great title for a show).  The plan would be to randomly distribute the scripts at each scene change, so that every kid gets a chance to play a role, without any fighting about who gets the good roles. Getting to read a part was the most important thing here.

I set about writing an amended script for kids, but luckily Bardfilm swooped in with a text he’d already done for a similar previous project.  One quick change to take out the various donkey/ass jokes ( I ran it by the teacher, who vetoed).  I swapped them out for “monkey” jokes.  Lost the verse, but as we’ll see the kids weren’t about to notice that.

I also get what turns out to be a brainstorm when I write to the teacher suggesting that, if they had time, her class could be propmasters.  I tell her that I will need something to represent “wall”, “lantern”, “dog”, “horn”, “flower”, “thorn bush”, some swords, and some crowns.  I was going to get into fairy wings but decided this would require too much quick changing and leave it out.  Meanwhile I’ve been to the craft store and found a lion mask and a monkey mask, that I’m keeping as a surprise.  The teacher agrees that doing props is an excellent idea and they will get right to it.

So I arrive first thing in the morning, with my bag of props. I’m wearing my t-shirt with the big picture of Shakespeare on it. I debate wearing “Shakespeare is Universal” but decide that a picture is worth a thousand words, and this is going to become something of a trademark for my teaching endeavors. I’m the guy that goes from classroom to classroom with a bunch of Shakespeare stuff.

I have no idea how long this will take, or how much time I have been allotted.  On the one hand I know that I will fill up whatever time I’m given.  On the other I have no idea whether any given speech is going to take one of these kids 10 seconds to read, or 2 minutes.  So on that front I’m just going to be winging it.

After introductions and things I ask who knows who Shakespeare was.  Surprisingly nobody answers.  I hold up a DVD of Gnomeo and Juliet and ask who has seen it. Most hands go up.  Then I hear a gasp of recognition as somebody whispers, “The statue guy!”  I confirm that Shakespeare wrote that one.  I then hold up Lion King and talk about the elements of Shakespeare in that one, too. I don’t do the whole “Lion King is a version of Hamlet” thing, as loyal readers know, but I’m not above using it as an example when I want to stress the “Shakespeare is around you more than you think” angle.


I break out my pop-up Globe Theatre.  Always good for some ooohs and aaaahs.  I break out my bust of Shakespeare, that I tell them travels with me wherever I go.  I hear one of my daughter’s friends note, “You brought that to Brownies last year!”  Good memory.

I break out my First Folio.  This is turning into a great prop.  It is big, it is heavy, it is cool.  I hold it above my head like something out of Raiders of the Lost Ark, speaking of it in reverent terms about how it is 400 years old, and how if Shakespeare’s friends had not gotten together to compile his plays, we might not have them today.  Then I drop it on the teacher’s desk, which I learned last time makes a great echo, and a memorable point indeed.

Then I go to one of my “Midsummer Night’s Dream for Kids” books, and start to get a little preachy on them.  “There are those grownups,” I tell them, “Who think they need to rewrite Shakespeare for kids. They think that actual Shakespeare is too hard for kids. They say that kids can’t understand real Shakespeare. I say nonsense!  Do you think this stuff is going to be too hard for you?”

“No!!!”

“Do you think you should have to wait until you’re teenagers before you get to read this?”

“NO!!!!”

“WHO WANTS TO ACT OUT SOME SHAKESPEARE?!”

Every hand shoots up.

“Well then, let’s begin!” I say, and pull 20+ scripts for A Midsummer Night’s Dream out of my bag of tricks.

…to be continued, because I am so very evil.  😉